Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
2.
Neurology ; 88(18): 1768-1775, 2017 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28381506

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We tested biweekly infusions of IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) as a possible treatment for mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia. METHODS: In a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 390 participants with mild to moderate AD to receive placebo (low-dose albumin) or IVIg (Gammagard Liquid; Baxalta, Bannockburn, IL) administered IV at doses of 0.2 or 0.4 g/kg every 2 weeks for 18 months. The primary cognitive outcome was change from baseline to 18 months on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale; the primary functional outcome was 18-month change on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory. Safety and tolerability data, as well as serial MRIs and plasma samples, were collected throughout the study from all enrolled participants. RESULTS: No beneficial effects were observed in the dual primary outcome measures for the 2 IVIg doses tested. Significant decreases in plasma Aß42 (but not Aß40) levels were observed in IVIg-treated participants. Analysis of safety data showed no difference between IVIg and placebo in terms of the rate of occurrence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (brain edema or microhemorrhage). IVIg-treated participants had more systemic reactions (chills, rashes) but fewer respiratory infections than participants receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with mild to moderate AD showed good tolerability of treatment with low-dose human IVIg for 18 months but did not show beneficial effects on cognition or function relative to participants who received placebo. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00818662. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that IVIg infusions performed every 2 weeks do not improve cognition or function at 18 months in patients with mild to moderate AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Nootrópicos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Alzheimer/genética , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides/sangue , Apolipoproteína E4/genética , Biomarcadores/sangue , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Canadá , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nootrópicos/efeitos adversos , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Falha de Tratamento , Estados Unidos
3.
J Clin Immunol ; 36(7): 700-12, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27582171

RESUMO

Patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) typically require life-long intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy to prevent recurrent infections. The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of a highly concentrated (20 %) Ig preparation for SC administration (IGSC 20 %) were evaluated in a prospective trial in patients with PIDD. A total of 74 patients (aged 3-83 years) received 4327 IGSC 20 % infusions over a median of 380.5 days. The rate of validated serious bacterial infections was 0.012 event/patient-year (p < 0.0001 compared with the historical control), and the annualized rate of infection was 2.41 events/patient. Median IgG trough levels were >14.5 g/l. The median maximum infusion rate was 60 ml/h/site (range 4.4-180), resulting in a median infusion duration of 0.95 h. A volume ≥30 ml was infused per site in 74.8 % of IGSC 20 % infusions. Most (84.9 %) infusions were administered using ≤2 infusion sites; for 99.8 % of infusions, there was no need to interrupt/stop administration or reduce the infusion rate. No related serious adverse event (AE) occurred during IGSC 20 % treatment; related non-serious AEs occurred at a rate of 0.036 event/infusion. The incidence of related local AEs was 0.015 event/infusion and of related systemic AEs was 0.021 event/infusion; most were mild in severity, none severe. Increased infusion rates or volumes were not associated with higher AE rates. The investigated IGSC 20 % treatment was shown to be effective and safe, enabling higher infusion rates and volumes per site compared to conventional SC treatments, resulting in fewer infusion sites and shorter infusion durations.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/farmacocinética , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/complicações , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/diagnóstico , Infusões Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Thromb Haemost ; 116(1): 58-68, 2016 07 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27052576

RESUMO

Severe congenital protein C (PC) deficiency (SCPCD) is associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), purpura fulminans (PF), and vascular thromboembolic events (TE), often leading to organ failure and death. PC replacement therapy offers a safe, effective treatment for thromboembolic complications of SCPCD and secondary prophylaxis for recurrent DIC, PF, and TEs. A prospective, multi-centre, open-label, phase 2/3 study was conducted to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of protein C concentrate for treatment of PF and acute TEs. Fifteen enrolled patients with SCPCD received protein C concentrate; 11 received treatment for acute TEs (PF, 18 events; PF and other coumarin-related vascular thromboembolic events [coumarin-induced skin necrosis; CISN], 1 event; venous thrombosis, 5 events). Pre-defined efficacy criteria for treatment of acute TEs were compared with a historical control arm (i. e. patients receiving conventional therapy without protein C replacement). PF/CISN was demonstrated by pre-defined primary and secondary efficacy ratings. Primary ratings of protein C concentrate-treated episodes were significantly higher (p=0.0032) than in the historical control. For 19 PF/CISN episodes in 11 patients, 94.7 % of treatments were rated effective and 5.3 % effective with complications (not related to protein C concentrate). In a secondary efficacy rating, all treatments were rated effective (68.4 % excellent; 21.1 % good; 10.5 % fair). For 5/24 vascular thrombosis episodes, 80 % of treatments were rated excellent and 20 % were rated good. No treatment-related adverse events or serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, protein C concentrate provides an efficacious, safe treatment for PF, CISN, and other TEs in SCPCD patients.


Assuntos
Deficiência de Proteína C/tratamento farmacológico , Proteína C/uso terapêutico , Púrpura Fulminante/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/tratamento farmacológico , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/etiologia , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteína C/efeitos adversos , Proteína C/farmacocinética , Deficiência de Proteína C/complicações , Deficiência de Proteína C/congênito , Púrpura Fulminante/etiologia , Púrpura Fulminante/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y) ; 2(2): 131-139, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29067300

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We present safety results from a study of Gammagard Liquid intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV) in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: This was a placebo-controlled double-blind study. Subjects were randomized to 400 mg/kg (n = 127), 200 mg/kg (n = 135) IGIV, or to 0.25% human albumin (n = 121) administered every 2 weeks ± 7 days for 18 months. RESULTS: Elevated risk ratios of IGIV versus placebo included chills (3.85) in 9.5% of IGIV-treated subjects (all doses), compared to 2.5% of placebo-treated subjects, and rash (3.08) in 15.3% of IGIV-treated subjects versus 5.0% of subjects treated with placebo. Subjects in the highest IGIV dose group had the lowest proportion of SAEs considered related to product (2 of 127 [1.6%]). Subjects treated with IGIV experienced a lower rate of respiratory and all other infections compared to placebo. DISCUSSION: IGIV-treated subjects did not experience higher rates of renal failure, lung injury, or thrombotic events than the placebo group. There were no unexpected safety findings. IGIV was well tolerated throughout 18 months of treatment in subjects aged 50-89 years.

6.
Blood ; 126(17): 2038-46, 2015 Oct 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26239086

RESUMO

This phase 3 trial evaluated the safety and hemostatic efficacy of a recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) for treatment of bleeds in severe von Willebrand disease (VWD). rVWF was initially administered together with recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) and subsequently alone, as long as hemostatic factor VIII activity (FVIII : C) levels were maintained. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated in a randomized cross-over design (rVWF vs rVWF:rFVIII at 50 IU VWF:ristocetin cofactor activity [RCo]/kg). Bleed control for all treated bleeds (N = 192 bleeds in 22 subjects) was rated good or excellent (96.9% excellent; 119 of 122 minor, 59 of 61 moderate, and 6 of 7 major bleeds) on a 4-point scale (4 = none to 1 = excellent). A single infusion was effective in 81.8% of bleeds. Treatment success, defined as the number of subjects with a mean efficacy rating of <2.5, was 100%. The PK profile of rVWF was not influenced by rFVIII (mean VWF:RCo terminal half-life: 21.9 hours for rVWF and 19.6 hours for rVWF:rFVIII). FVIII : C levels increased rapidly after rVWF alone, with hemostatic levels achieved within 6 hours and sustained through 72 hours after infusion. Eight adverse events (AEs; 6 nonserious AEs in 4 subjects and 2 serious AEs [chest discomfort and increased heart rate, without cardiac symptomatology] concurrently in 1 subject) were associated with rVWF. There were no thrombotic events or severe allergic reactions. No VWF or FVIII inhibitors, anti-VWF binding antibodies, or antibodies against host cell proteins were detected. These results show that rVWF was safe and effective in treating bleeds in VWD patients and stabilizes endogenous FVIII : C, which may eliminate the need for rFVIII after the first infusion. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01410227.


Assuntos
Hemostáticos , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacocinética , Doenças de von Willebrand/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de von Willebrand/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Seguimentos , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Distribuição Tecidual , Adulto Jovem , Doenças de von Willebrand/metabolismo , Doenças de von Willebrand/patologia , Fator de von Willebrand/administração & dosagem
7.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 22(1): 46-55, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25355797

RESUMO

Studies on candidate pandemic vaccines against avian influenza viruses have focused on H5N1, but viruses of other subtypes, such as A/H9N2, are also considered to have pandemic potential. We investigated the safety and immunogenicity of two immunizations with one of five different antigen doses (ranging from 3.75 to 45 µg of hemagglutinin antigen) of a nonadjuvanted whole-virus G9 lineage H9N2 influenza virus vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 to 49 years. The antibody responses were measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI), microneutralization (MN), and single radial hemolysis (SRH) assays. To investigate a hypothesis that previous exposure to H2N2 viruses in subjects born in or before 1968 might prime for more robust antibody responses to H9N2 vaccination than that in subjects born after 1968, a post hoc age-stratified analysis of antibody responses was done. Both vaccinations in all dose groups were safe and well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported, and the majority of the adverse reactions were rated as mild. The rates of injection site reactions were lower in the 3.75-µg- and 7.5-µg-dose groups than those in the higher-dose groups; the rates of systemic reactions were similar across all dose groups. The seroprotection rates among the different dose groups 21 days after the second immunization ranged from 52.8% to 88.9% as measured by HI assay, from 88.7% to 98.1% or 82.7% to 96.2% as measured by MN assay (MN titer cutoffs, 1:40 and 1:80, respectively), and from 94.2% to 100% as measured by SRH assay. Higher antibody responses were not induced in subjects born in or before 1968. These data indicate that a nonadjuvanted whole-virus H9N2 vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy adults. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01320696.).


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H9N2/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Imunodifusão , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Neutralização , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Infect Dis ; 209(1): 12-23, 2014 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24041789

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Children are highly vulnerable to infection with novel influenza viruses. It is essential to develop candidate pandemic influenza vaccines that are safe and effective in the pediatric population. METHODS: Infants and children aged 6-35 months and 3-8 years, respectively, were randomized to receive 2 immunizations with a 7.5-µg or 3.75-µg hemagglutinin (HA) dose of a nonadjuvanted whole-virus A/Vietnam(H5N1) vaccine; adolescents aged 9-17 years received a 7.5-µg dose only. A subset of participants received a booster immunization with an A/Indonesia(H5N1) vaccine approximately 1 year later. HA and neuraminidase antibody responses were assessed. RESULTS: Vaccination was safe and well tolerated; adverse reactions were transient and predominantly mild. Two immunizations with the 7.5-µg dose of A/Vietnam vaccine induced virus microneutralization (MN) titers of ≥1:20 against the A/Vietnam strain in 68.8%-85.4% of participants in the different age groups. After the booster, 93.1%-100% of participants achieved MN titers of ≥1:20 against the A/Vietnam and A/Indonesia strains. Neuraminidase-inhibiting antibodies were induced in ≥90% of participants after 2 immunizations with the 7.5 µg A/Vietnam vaccine and in 100% of participants after the booster. CONCLUSIONS: A whole-virus influenza A(H5N1) vaccine is suitable for prepandemic or pandemic immunization in a pediatric population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01052402.


Assuntos
Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Chlorocebus aethiops , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Masculino , Células Vero
9.
Vaccine ; 31(35): 3611-6, 2013 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23672977

RESUMO

Since the introduction of the meningococcal C conjugate (MCC) vaccine in the pediatric population in 1999, numerous clinical studies have confirmed the immunogenicity and safety of the NeisVac-C(®) vaccine, and several have observed a strong immune response after a single priming dose, which could be successfully boosted. Maximizing protection of infants with as few vaccine doses as possible would increase the general acceptability of the immunization strategies and support broader coverage without increasing vaccination costs. This was a randomized feasibility study of a single priming NeisVac-C(®) vaccine dose administered at 4 or 6 months of age, compared to the currently licensed two dose priming at 2 and 4 months of age, followed by a booster vaccination at 12-13 months of age. High seroprotection rates and serum bactericidal antibody (rSBA) titers were observed in all study groups, whether a single or two dose priming vaccination was administered, at all time points investigated: one month after the priming vaccination(s) (>99% of subjects rSBA≥8), prior to booster vaccination (>65% of subjects with rSBA≥8, with the lowest titers and GMTs seen in the two dose priming group), as well as after booster vaccination administration (99% with rSBA≥128 in all three study groups, with the highest GMT of 2472 seen in the 4 month single dose group). This study confirmed trends seen in previous reports that a single-dose priming vaccination at 4 or 6 months of age can be considered a valuable alternative to the currently licensed two-dose priming vaccination schedule.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Lactente , Masculino , Meningite Meningocócica/imunologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Polônia , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/administração & dosagem , Espanha , Vacinação , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Conjugadas/imunologia
10.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 13(8): 680-9, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23665341

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto in the USA and by several Borrelia species in Europe and Asia, but no human vaccine is available. We investigated the safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines containing protective epitopes from Borrelia species outer surface protein A (OspA) serotypes in healthy adults. METHODS: Between March 1, 2011, and May 8, 2012, we did a double-blind, randomised, dose-escalation phase 1/2 study at four sites in Austria and Germany. Healthy adults aged 18-70 years who were seronegative for B. burgdorferi sensu lato were eligible for inclusion. Participants were recruited sequentially and randomly assigned to one of six study groups in equal ratios via an electronic data capture system. Participants and investigators were masked to group allocation. Participants received three vaccinations containing 30 µg, 60 µg, or 90 µg OspA antigen with or without an adjuvant, with intervals of 28 days, and a booster 9-12 months after the first immunisation. The coprimary endpoints were the frequency and severity of injection-site and systemic reactions within 7 days of each vaccination, and the antibody responses to OspA serotypes 1-6, as established by ELISA. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01504347. FINDINGS: 300 participants were randomly assigned: 151 to adjuvanted vaccines (50 to 30 µg, 51 to 60 µg, and 50 to 90 µg doses), and 149 to non-adjuvanted vaccines (50 to 30 µg, 49 to 60 µg, and 50 to 90 µg doses). Adverse reactions were predominantly mild, and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. The risk of systemic reactions (risk ratio 0·54 [95% CI 0·41-0·70]; p<0·0001) and of moderate or severe systemic reactions (0·35 [0·13-0·92]; p=0·034) was significantly lower for adjuvanted than non-adjuvanted formulations. The 30 µg adjuvanted formulation had the best tolerability profile; only headache (five [10%, 95% CI 4-20] of 50), injection-site pain (16 [32%, 21-45]), and tenderness (17 [34%, 23-47]) affected more than 6% of patients. All doses and formulations induced substantial mean IgG antibody titres against OspA serotypes 1-6 after the first three vaccinations (range 6944-17,321) and booster (19,056-32,824) immunisations. The 30 µg adjuvanted formulation induced the highest antibody titres after the booster: range 26,143 (95% CI 18,906-36,151) to 42,381 (31,288-57,407). INTERPRETATION: The novel multivalent OspA vaccine could be an effective intervention for prevention of Lyme borreliosis in Europe and the USA, and possibly worldwide. Larger confirmatory formulation studies will need to be done that include individuals seropositive for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato before placebo-controlled phase 3 efficacy studies can begin. FUNDING: Baxter.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Superfície/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Superfície/imunologia , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/efeitos adversos , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/imunologia , Vacinas Bacterianas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Borrelia burgdorferi/imunologia , Lipoproteínas/efeitos adversos , Lipoproteínas/imunologia , Vacinas contra Doença de Lyme/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Doença de Lyme/imunologia , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Adulto Jovem
11.
Vaccine ; 30(43): 6127-35, 2012 Sep 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22884662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Influenza pandemic preparedness involves priming of the population with pre-pandemic vaccines. Such vaccines should be well tolerated and induce a long-lasting immunological memory that can effectively be boosted with a single dose of pandemic vaccine once available. The presented studies assessed different prime-boost regimens with a Vero cell-derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine. METHODS: In one study, 281 healthy adult (18-59 years) and 280 elderly (≥ 60 years) subjects received two vaccinations, 21 days apart, with Vero cell-derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine (7.5 µg HA Antigen A/Vietnam/1203/2004) followed by a 6, 12-15, or 24 month booster (7.5 or 3.75µg A/Indonesia/05/2005 or A/Vietnam/1203/2004). In the other study, 230 healthy adults (18-59 years) received single dose priming (7.5 µg A/Vietnam/1203/2004) followed by a 12 month booster (7.5 or 3.75 µg A/Indonesia/05/2005). Antibody responses were assessed by microneutralization (MN) and single radial hemolysis (SRH) assay. Vaccine safety was assessed throughout. RESULTS: Two dose priming was equally immunogenic in adults and the elderly: >72% of subjects in each population achieved MN titers ≥ 1:20 after the second vaccination. Booster vaccinations at 6, 12-15, and 24 months induced substantial antibody increases to both strains: after a 7.5 µg A/Indonesia/05/2005 booster, 93-95% of adults and 72-84% of the elderly achieved MN titers ≥ 1:20 against this strain. Homologous and heterologous booster responses were higher in the 7.5µg dose group than in the 3.75 µg dose group. Booster responses following single dose priming were similar; a 7.5 µg booster dose induced homologous MN titers ≥ 1:20 in 93% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: A Vero cell derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine is well tolerated and induces long-lasting cross-clade immunological memory that can be effectively boosted 1-2 years after two dose or single dose priming, supporting its suitability for pre-pandemic vaccination.


Assuntos
Reações Cruzadas/imunologia , Memória Imunológica , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Adulto , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Formação de Anticorpos , Chlorocebus aethiops , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Neutralização , Células Vero , Adulto Jovem
12.
Vaccine ; 30(41): 5956-66, 2012 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846396

RESUMO

This phase 1/2 open-label, randomized clinical study investigated the safety and immunogenicity of a non-adjuvanted, whole virus, Vero cell-derived H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine (A/H1N1/California/07/2009) in children and adolescents (6 months to 17 years). Subjects were stratified by age (6-11 months, 12-35 months, 3-8 years, 9-17 years) to receive two vaccinations 21 days apart of either the 3.75 µg or 7.5 µg dose. A booster with a licensed trivalent seasonal (2010/2011) influenza vaccine was administered one year after the first vaccination to a subgroup that had previously received the 7.5 µg dose. A single vaccination with the 7.5 µg dose induced high seroprotection rates in all subjects, namely: 88.0% (9-17 years); 68.0% (3-8 years); 42.9% (12-35 months); and 50.0% (6-11 months). Following a second vaccination, seroprotection rates ranged from 84.2% to 100%. GMTs after two vaccinations with the 7.5 µg dose (as determined by HI) were also substantial: reaching 210.0 (9-17 years), 196.2 (3-8 years), 118.9 (12-35 months) and 99.6 (6-11 months). Antibody persistence was demonstrated at 6 months (GMTs ranging from 65.6 to 212.8 with the 7.5 µg dose) and at 12 months (GMTs ranging from 33.6 to 124.1 with the 7.5 µg dose) after primary vaccination. The booster vaccination induced a strong response to the A/California/07/2009 strain, reaching 100% seroprotection in all age groups, with GMTs ranging from 640.0 to 886.3. The vaccine was well tolerated, inducing low adverse reaction rates (overall fever rate: 6% after the first vaccination; 7% after the second vaccination), even in young children. These data confirm that the H1N1 whole-virus Vero cell-derived pandemic influenza vaccine is suitable for use in children and adolescents; a 2-dose primary vaccination induces a memory response in a naïve population that can be effectively boosted with the A/H1N1/California/07/2009 component of a seasonal influenza vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976469.


Assuntos
Memória Imunológica , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/patogenicidade , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Chlorocebus aethiops , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Imunização Secundária , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Injeções Intramusculares , Vacinação/métodos , Células Vero
13.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 8(6): 736-42, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699436

RESUMO

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination strategies to induce optimal seroprotection in children are under constant evaluation. This multi-center, randomized, controlled, phase III clinical study examined antibody persistence in children aged 1-11 y following two prospectively administered doses of either the FSME-IMMUN® Junior or Encepur Children® vaccines, as well as investigating the immunogenicity, safety and vaccine interchangeability of a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN(®) Junior. A high level of antibody persistence was observed in all subjects 6 mo after the first of two vaccinations with either pediatric TBE vaccine. Based on both immunological tests and viral antigens used, slightly higher seropositivity rates and higher GMCs /GMTs were found in children vaccinated with FSME-IMMUN® Junior compared with those who received Encepur® Children. Seropositivity rates across all age strata combined six months after the first vaccination with FSME-IMMUN® 0.25 mL Junior were 95.1% as determined by Immunozym ELISA, 93.2% as determined by Enzygnost ELISA and 95.3% as determined by NT; compared with 62.6%, 80.5% and 91.0% respectively after vaccination with Encepur® Children. A third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN(®) Junior induced 100% seropositivity in both study groups and was well tolerated as demonstrated by the low rates of systemic and injection site reactions. Subjects who received either FSME-IMMUN Junior® or Encepur(®) Children vaccine for the first two vaccinations and FSME-IMMUN Junior® for the third showed a comparably strong immune response regardless of the previous TBE vaccine administered, demonstrating that two vaccinations with Encepur® Children can successfully be followed by a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN Junior®.


Assuntos
Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/imunologia , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinas Virais/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Vírus da Encefalite Transmitidos por Carrapatos/imunologia , Vírus da Encefalite Transmitidos por Carrapatos/patogenicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
14.
Vaccine ; 30(30): 4543-51, 2012 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22475864

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune responses to novel pandemic influenza vaccines may be influenced by previous exposure to antigenically similar seasonal strains. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, phase I/II study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a non-adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus H1N1 A/California/07/2009 vaccine. 408 subjects were stratified by age (18-59 and >60 years) and randomized 1:1 to receive two vaccinations with either 3.75 or 7.5 µg hemagglutinin antigen 21 days apart. Safety, immunogenicity and the influence of seasonal influenza vaccination and antibody cross-reactivity with a seasonal H1N1 strain was assessed. RESULTS: A single vaccination with either dose induced substantial increases in H1N1 A/California/07/2009 hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralizing (MN) antibody titers in both adult and elderly subjects. A single 7.5 µg dose induced seroprotection rates of 86.9% in adults and 75.2% in elderly subjects. Two 7.5 µg vaccinations induced seroprotection rates in adult and elderly subjects of 90.9% and 89.1%, respectively. The robust immune response to vaccination was confirmed by analyses of neutralizing antibody titers. Both HI and MN antibodies persisted for ≥ 6 months post-vaccination. Between 34% and 49% of subjects had seroprotective levels of H1N1 A/California/07/2009 antibodies at baseline. Higher baseline HI titers were associated with receipt of the 2008-09 or 2009-10 seasonal influenza vaccine. High baseline A/California/07/2009 neutralizing antibody titers were also associated with high baseline titers against A/New Caledonia/20/99, a seasonal H1N1 strain which circulated and was included in the seasonal vaccine from 2000-01 to 2006-07. Pre-adsorption with A/H1N1/New Caledonia/20/99 antigen reduced A/H1N1/California/07/2009 baseline titers in 55% of tested sera. The vaccine was well tolerated with low rates of fever. CONCLUSIONS: A whole-virus H1N1 A/California/07/2009 vaccine was safe and well tolerated and a single dose induced substantial immune responses similar to seasonal influenza vaccines, probably due to immunological priming by previous seasonal influenza vaccines or infections.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Chlorocebus aethiops , Reações Cruzadas , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/biossíntese , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Células Vero , Adulto Jovem
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 54(7): 946-54, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22267715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge of the consistency of protection induced by seasonal influenza vaccines over the duration of a full influenza season is limited, and little is known about the clinical course of disease in individuals who become infected despite vaccination. METHODS: Data from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial undertaken in healthy young adults in the 2008-2009 influenza season were used to investigate the weekly cumulative efficacy of a Vero cell culture-derived influenza vaccine. In addition, the duration and severity of disease in vaccine and placebo recipients with cell culture-confirmed influenza infection were compared. RESULTS: Vaccine efficacy against matching strains was consistently high (73%-82%) throughout the study, including the entire period of the influenza season during which influenza activity was above the epidemic threshold. Vaccine efficacy was also consistent (68%-83%) when calculated for all strains, irrespective of antigenic match. Vaccination also ameliorated disease symptoms when infection was not prevented. Bivariate analysis of duration and severity showed a significant amelioration of myalgia (P = .003), headache (P = .025), and fatigue (P = .013) in infected vaccinated subjects compared with placebo. Cough (P = .143) and oropharyngeal pain (P = .083) were also reduced in infected vaccinated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: A Vero cell culture-derived influenza vaccine provides consistently high levels of protection against cell culture-confirmed infection by seasonal influenza virus and significantly reduces the duration and severity of disease in those individuals in which infection is not prevented. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00566345.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/patologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Animais , Biotecnologia/métodos , Técnicas de Cultura de Células/métodos , Chlorocebus aethiops , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Células Vero , Adulto Jovem
16.
Blood ; 119(2): 612-8, 2012 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22042695

RESUMO

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a coagulation factor between groups of patients can be biased by differences in study protocols, in particular between blood sampling schedules. This could affect clinical dose tailoring, especially in children. The aim of this study was to describe the relationships of the PK of factor VIII (FVIII) with age and body weight by a population PK model. The potential to reduce blood sampling was also explored. A model was built for FVIII PK from 236 infusions of recombinant FVIII in 152 patients (1-65 years of age) with severe hemophilia A. The PK of FVIII over the entire age range was well described by a 2-compartment model and a previously reported problem, resulting from differences in blood sampling, to compare findings from children and adults was practically abolished. The decline in FVIII clearance and increase in half-life with age could be described as continuous functions. Retrospective reduction of blood sampling from 11 to 5 samples made no important difference to the estimates of PK parameters. The obtained findings can be used as a basis for PK-based dose tailoring of FVIII in clinical practice, in all age groups, with minimal blood sampling.


Assuntos
Fator VIII/administração & dosagem , Fator VIII/farmacocinética , Hemofilia A/prevenção & controle , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Peso Corporal , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Hemofilia A/sangue , Hemofilia A/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição Tecidual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
17.
Vaccine ; 30(2): 329-35, 2012 Jan 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080174

RESUMO

A successful vaccine development strategy for areas with clustered H5N1 events requires conduct of vaccine trials in potentially non-naïve subjects and evaluation of post-vaccination responsiveness. An open-label, randomized, phase I/II study therefore assessed the immunogenicity and safety of two different dose levels of an inactivated, non-adjuvanted, whole virus clade 2.1 (A/Indonesia/05/2005) H5N1 Vero cell-derived influenza vaccine in healthy adults (21-45 years) from a region where the virus has been circulating (Hong Kong) as well as Singapore. Subjects (N=110) were randomized 1:1 to receive two vaccinations with either 3.75 µg or 7.5 µg H5N1 haemagglutinin antigen 21 days apart. Safety, immunogenicity (microneutralization [MN] and single radial haemolysis [SRH] at baseline and post-vaccination) and cross-reactivity against a heterologous clade 1 strain (A/Vietnam/1203/2004) of the vaccine were assessed. Pre-existing immunity to the vaccine strain was 14% which is higher than previously reported for these regions. Two vaccinations with either vaccine formulation induced high seroprotection rates (MN titre ≥ 1:20) against the vaccine strain A/Indonesia/05/2005: 82.7% and 86.5% in the 3.75 µg and 7.5 µg dose groups. Seroconversion rates and fold increase exceeded the CPMP criterion of >40% and >2.5 for MN and SRH in both dose groups after the second vaccination, while the seroprotection rate in the 7.5 µg dose group determined by SRH was only marginally lower (69.2%) than the CPMP criterion of >70%. Thus, 11 of 12 CHMP criteria were fulfilled. A cross-reactive antibody response against the heterologous A/Vietnam/1203/2004 strain was demonstrated after the second vaccination (>21% by MN and ≥ 25% by SRH). Persistence of antibodies against the vaccine strain was also demonstrated 6 months after the first vaccination, indicating that a booster vaccination would be effective in those who have received two priming doses. No serious adverse events were reported. The H5N1 influenza vaccine against clade 2.1 strain A/Indonesia/05/2005 was well tolerated and immunogenic after two vaccinations, and induced a cross-neutralizing antibody response, with no dose effect.


Assuntos
Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Adulto , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Chlorocebus aethiops , Reações Cruzadas , Hong Kong , Humanos , Imunoensaio , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Singapura , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Células Vero
18.
Vaccine ; 30(29): 4377-86, 2012 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22172502

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cell culture technologies have the potential to improve the robustness and flexibility of influenza vaccine supply and to substantially shorten manufacturing timelines. We investigated the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of a Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine and utilized these studies to establish a serological correlate of vaccine protection. METHODS: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III trials were undertaken in the US during the 2008-2009 Northern hemisphere influenza season, in young (18-49 years) and older (50-64 years and ≥ 65 years) adult subjects. 7250 young adults were randomized 1:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or placebo. 3210 older adult subjects were randomized 8:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or a licensed egg-derived vaccine. Serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers were assessed 21 days post-vaccination. Vaccine efficacy in preventing cell culture-confirmed influenza infection was determined for the young adult population. Local and systemic adverse events were recorded in both studies. RESULTS: The Vero-derived vaccine was safe and well tolerated in both young and older adults. All US and European immunological licensing thresholds were comfortably met in both populations. Vaccine efficacy in young adults was 79% against A/H1N1 viruses antigenically matching the corresponding vaccine strain and 78.5% for all antigenically matched influenza viruses. A hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer of ≥ 1:15 provided a reliable correlate of protection for the Vero-derived influenza vaccine, with no additional benefit at titers >1:30. Bridging of the correlate of protection established in the young adult population to the older adult immunogenicity data demonstrated the likely effectiveness of the Vero-derived vaccine in the older adult population. CONCLUSIONS: A Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine is safe, immunogenic and protects against infection with influenza virus. The novel vaccine technology has the potential to make a substantial contribution to improving influenza vaccine supply. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00566345 and NCT00782431.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/biossíntese , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Chlorocebus aethiops , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Células Vero , Adulto Jovem
19.
Vaccine ; 29(50): 9376-84, 2011 Nov 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22001875

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ross River virus (RRV) is endemic in Australia and several South Pacific Islands. Approximately 5000 cases of RRV disease, which is characterized by debilitating polyarthritis, are recorded each year in Australia. This study describes the first clinical trial of a candidate RRV vaccine. METHODS: An inactivated whole-virus Vero cell-derived RRV vaccine was tested in 382 healthy, RRV-naïve adults in a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study at ten sites in Austria, Belgium and The Netherlands. Subjects were equally randomized to receive 1.25 µg, 2.5 µg, 5 µg, or 10 µg aluminum hydroxide-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted RRV vaccine, with a second dose after three weeks and a booster at six months. Vaccine immunogenicity was determined by measurements of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody titers. Vaccine tolerability and safety were monitored over the entire study period. RESULTS: The optimal vaccine formulation was the adjuvanted 2.5 µg dose, as calculated using a repeated mixed model analysis of covariance comparing log-transformed RRV-specific IgG titers between different dose groups. Geometric means of RRV-specific serum antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccination with the 2.5 µg adjuvanted formulation were 520.9 (90% CI 377.2-719.4) as determined by IgG ELISA and 119.9 (82.6-173.9) as determined by virus neutralization assay, resulting in seropositivity rates of 92.9% (82.6-98.0) and 92.7% (82.2-98.0), respectively. All vaccine formulations and doses were well tolerated after the first, second and third vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus Vero cell-derived Ross River virus vaccine is highly immunogenic in RRV-naïve adults and well tolerated at all dose levels.


Assuntos
Infecções por Alphavirus/prevenção & controle , Ross River virus/imunologia , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecções por Alphavirus/imunologia , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Áustria , Bélgica , Chlorocebus aethiops , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Masculino , Países Baixos , Testes de Neutralização , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Células Vero , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
20.
Vaccine ; 29(43): 7307-19, 2011 Oct 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21843576

RESUMO

The need for highly effective tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccines has increased globally due to a variety of factors including climate, social, economic and demographic changes, which are thought to have promoted the expansion of the endemic region of TBE viruses. The first TBE vaccine, FSME-IMMUN Inject, was introduced in the 1970s and has been continually improved since then to enhance both its safety and immunogenicity. The current formulation was established in 2001 and is marketed as FSME-IMMUN. This review summarizes findings of the clinical development programme since 2001 regarding determination of the optimal dose, conventional and rapid vaccination schedules, vaccination in adults, the elderly and special patient populations, safety, immunogenicity, and immunopersistence in adults and children, comparison of FSME-IMMUN with another commercially available TBE vaccine as well as post-marketing vaccination outcome. This successful research programme demonstrated the strong immunogenicity and continued safety of the FSME-IMMUN vaccine, which is further confirmed by the performance reported under field conditions.


Assuntos
Vírus da Encefalite Transmitidos por Carrapatos/imunologia , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antivirais/biossíntese , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinação , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...